Copyright
© 2020 John
F. Oyler
January
30, 2020
“Pop” Ferree’s Workbooks
The Bridgeville Area
Historical Society recently acquired a curious set of workbooks with no record
of their donor nor any explanation of their origin. I was able to borrow the
first one in the series and have enjoyed going through it.
The worksheets are 8” by 10
½”, some typed, some filled with meticulous hand calculations, and some containing
scaled plots of land surveys. Each book has a return address label on it,
giving the name of Joseph A. Ferree and his address on Chestnut Street.
Book One is entitled
“Bridgeville, 1786 – 1846. There are more than three hundred individual sheets in
the book, most of which are blank on the back. I have gotten to page 400 and
September,1821.
The first entry in the book is a typed page
with the heading “February 8, 1786, from Warrantee Atlas”. It then describes
the property “Water Inclosure”, that was patented to Thomas Redman on that
date. The rest of the page records the twenty line courses of its survey,
“copied from the Atlas”. The property included 208 acres of land bounded
(“inclosed”) by the large loop Chartiers Creek makes north of Bridgeville.
The next sheet is a carbon
copy of the first, with penciled notes reporting that the property was
subdivided on September 16, 1786, with 107 acres going to James Cristy and the
balance to Daniel Herbert. The next six pages (three sheets front and back) are
immaculate pencil calculations of the components of each course, followed by a
scaled plot of the survey.
Then comes a similar
treatment of Thomas Ramsey’s “Purity”, 102 acres south and west of Redman’s
property, and Benjamin Rennoe’s “Widow’s
Portion”, 342 acres south and east of Redman’s (and east of Ramsey’s). These
are followed by a chronological sequence of land transactions in the
Bridgeville area.
It appears that someone
(probably Mr. Ferree) took on the project of recording and plotting the history
of property changes in this area, utilizing information from the Allegheny
Recorder of Deeds Department and the Allegheny County Warrantee Atlas.
Joseph Ferree began teaching
at Bridgeville High School in 1910 when it consisted of two grades and a total
of nineteen students. He was still going strong in the early 1950s, a
completely different environment. Our class referred to him as “Pop” Ferree
and, as a sign of respect, “the Old Sage”.
We know he was a member of
the “Historical Book Committee” for Bridgeville’s Golden Jubilee Celebration in
1951. The precision of the calculations and plotting in this work book
certainly is representative of my memory of him; I am convinced it was his
project.
In addition to his being my
mathematics teacher in high school, our family had several other ties to the
Ferrees. His son, Origen (better known as Gus), coached my brother’s Knee Pants
League baseball team. When my mother volunteered at the Bridgeville Public
Library, she became close friends with Gus’ wife, Ada.
I was particularly interested
in the surveys recorded in the original warrants. In the early days surveys
were a record of the landmarks which defined the boundaries of the property;
the azimuths and distances were merely recorded to provide the approximate
location of the next landmark (corner).
For example, the survey for
Rennoe”s “Widow’s Portion” begins at a white oak tree that is a corner of Henry
Evault’s adjacent property and proceeds North 68 degrees west, 98 perches to a
“linn” on the bank of McLaughlin Run. “Linn” is a Scotch word for steep ravine
or gully; our landmark was the point where a prominent gully intersected
McLaughlin Run.
We were instructed to begin
at the white oak and aim our compass 68 degrees west of north. A “perch”, also
known as a pole or a rod, was sixteen and a half feet long. If we marched 98
perches (1,617 feet plus or minus eight feet three inches) in the proper
direction we should find the desired “linn”.
The approximations of both
angle and distance were acceptable as long as we could use them to locate the
corners (landmarks). As a general check and to evaluate the error of these
approximations, the surveyor would then calculate the true components of each
course and add them to determine his “error of closure”.
For this survey Mr. Ferree
calculated an error of closure of nearly eighteen perches (nearly three hundred
feet). This seems like a lot until you realize that the survey consisted of
twenty-five courses totaling nearly four miles.
By the time I was learning
surveying, instrument precision had improved by an order of magnitude. We would
read angles to the nearest fifteen seconds and distances to fractions of an
inch. An acceptable error of closure in those days for a survey of this length
would have been well under five feet.
We are fortunate that Pop
Ferree took on this project and has provided us with so much relevant
information. As I continue to investigate it, I will report on the earliest
days of our community.
No comments:
Post a Comment